FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Without the Correct Approach and Implementation,
Long-Term Effectiveness of Account-Based Health Plans Could Be
Undermined, Towers Perrin Research Shows
New Study Shows That Employees Lack Competency,
Comfort, Understanding and Satisfaction With Account-Based Health
Plans
STAMFORD, CT., May 22, 2007¾ Despite the short-term
financial savings achieved by some employers, new Towers Perrin
research shows that the long-term effectiveness of account-based
health plans (ABHPs), or "consumer-driven health plans," may be in
question.
According to the newly released 2007 Towers Perrin Study on
Account-Based Health Plans, employers and employees are not
reaping ABHPs' full rewards. Employees currently enrolled in
ABHPs are significantly less satisfied with many elements of the
health benefit plan compared to those enrolled in traditional health
benefit plans. And efforts by employers and health plans to date
have not strengthened employeesf confidence and competence as health
care consumers. But, more encouraging, the research also shows
that when employees do have a strong understanding of their ABHP and
feel comfortable with the level of perceived financial risk
associated with it, they better utilize the plan and its resources,
thus becoming better health care consumers.
Analyzing ABHPs After the First Years of Meaningful
Experience The survey, which is the first of its kind, was
created to determine which design and operational elements best
deliver on their promise to make employees smarter health care
consumers. One thousand employees, who are either currently
enrolled in ABHPs or have an ABHP as an option but chose a
traditional plan, were polled earlier this year to analyze their
self-reported perceptions around plan design best practices, tool
and resource availability, and employer communication efforts.
Employees were selected randomly and represent large employers
nationally. ABHP respondentsf perceptions were compared against
those enrolled in traditional health plans.
"The Towers Perrin research is the first study to analyze ABHPs
after several years of meaningful experience and to compare
responses from ABHP members and traditional plan members," said Dave
Guilmette, Managing Director of Towers Perrinfs Health and Welfare
practice. "Our intent was to identify the plan features that
best influence employee attitudes and consumer behaviors and that
best attract participants. We were surprised to find that
employees' attitudes and behaviors were less affected by plan
features than by other employer practices. Employees have been
affected more on an emotional level than a rational level ¾ and not
always positively."
As compared to traditional health benefit plan participants, ABHP
members are less comfortable with the level of financial risk their
plan exposes them to, less likely to understand how the plan works,
less favorable about how easy it is to use the plan, less favorable
about the clarity of communication around benefit change and less
satisfied with the basic elements of their plans -- including access
to affordable, quality health care (Exhibit 1).
"Quite startlingly, ABHP members are significantly less satisfied
than those in traditional health benefit plans, when in fact they
shouldn't be. Employees are using a traditional yardstick to
measure these plans but, frankly, employers need to give them a new
yardstick," continued Guilmette. "ABHP members often have
access to the same provider networks as those in the traditional
health plans, with the added benefits of being able to save for
future medical expenses, but the overall perception on the part of
employees is that ABHPs are cheaper and inferior plans. The
employees' views suggest a lack of trust in employer practices and
motives surrounding the introduction of ABHP plan
options. Clearly, employers need to recondition employees to
appreciate a longer-term view of their health benefits and to help
them understand that ABHPs are not lesser plans."
A Nation of Spenders, Not Savers While ABHP
participants have acknowledged their willingness to take on more
responsibility by enrolling in the plans, they are not taking
advantage of the plan features that allow them to manage risk, such
as saving to protect themselves from future health-related
costs.
According to the Towers Perrin survey, while 29% try to reserve
account money for future financial protection, and 16% use the ABHP
to save for health care expenses in retirement (see Exhibit
2), the majority of participants have yet to fully-appreciate
the value of this opportunity.
"Contrary to the designed purpose of ABHPs, employees do not
appreciate the long-term potential these savings accounts hold and
remain mired in the old 'use it or lose it' mentality of flexible
spending accounts," commented Guilmette. "If this perception
is not changed quickly, employees will be missing out on a critical
benefit, and the intended financial incentives will not work
correctly. One of the keys to changing this perception is for
employers to help employees plan for and manage financial risk as
part of the transition to decision-making responsibility that comes
with enrolling in an ABHP."
Unless employee attitudes improve, it is not realistic to expect
that the ABHP approach will attract a majority of employees, nor
will the experience enhance their commitment to their
employers. On the contrary, continuation of the present views
could lead to resistance by employees and detract from their
commitment.
Are Account-based Health Plan Supporters Premature in
Declaring Success? Account-based health plans are currently
viewed by employers and health plans as one of the best available
solutions to controlling health care costs and driving behavior
change among employees. If designed and executed correctly,
these plans can be a win-win proposition for employers and
employees, and Towers Perrin research certainly shows signs that
ABHPs can deliver on that promise.
But Towers Perrin research also raises the question of whether
previous studies have been measuring program performance in ways
that tell the full story. The long-term success of ABHPs
depends on more than the financial incentives implicit in the plan
design and, while these plans have achieved some short-term cost
savings, employees still lack competency, comfort, understanding and
satisfaction with the plans. This general lack of satisfaction,
awareness and understanding around ABHPs is a significant barrier to
good long-term consumer behavior and positive change on the part of
employees.
"ABHPs have lowered health care costs for employers but the
widespread confusion and dissatisfaction reported by employees are
key indicators that the conditions for long-term success are not yet
in place," said Guilmette."Any consumer product that scored as low
as ABHPs do in terms of customer satisfaction and understanding
would be significantly retooled or pulled from the
shelves. Therefore, Towers Perrin hopes this research serves as
a wake-up call to employers and health plans, and strongly
encourages them to address employee concerns with ABHPs,
now. Otherwise, the promise ABHPs hold will not be
realized."
Failure -- or even the suboptimal performance -- of ABHPs can
have serious consequences for employees and employers
alike. For employees it means that they would be prevented from
experiencing the important benefits (such as accumulating money for
retiree health care) associated with ABHPs. For employers, the
mistrust that would be created has negative consequences for the
company's internal brand that go far beyond the benefit program in
its effect on productivity (see Exhibit 3). For example,
50% of ABHP members who are comfortable with their financial risk
say that their health plan impacts their personal commitment and
motivation to do a good job for the organization vs. 21% of ABHP
members who are uncomfortable with their financial risk.
Realizing the Long-term Promise of Account-based Health
Plans Account-based health plans are not working as well as
they could because employers have not explained the benefits in ways
that resonate with employees or make them comfortable.
However, the survey shows that
when employees have an understanding how their ABHP works and feel
comfortable with the level of financial risk associated with it,
they more actively utilize the plan and its resources, and become
smarter health care consumers (see Exhibits 4 and
5). For example, 88% of ABHP members who are comfortable
with their level of financial risk feel their experience in the
health plan so far has been good, versus 29% of those who are
uncomfortable, and 86% of ABHP members who are comfortable with
their level of financial risk understand how their health plan works
versus 41% of those who are uncomfortable.
"Employers have not sufficiently changed their communication
style or methods to correspond to the new health plans and, in fact,
often continue to communicate in the same ways that have
historically marked employee benefit plans," said Guilmette.
"Although employees are expected to fully understand their
financial obligations under the new plans, many employers are wary
of creating discomfort or confusion. Therefore, employers often
take a minimalist approach to informing employees of the details or
intricacies of the plans. But the unintended result is that
employees feel even more uncomfortable and confused by the plans,
and cannot reap the full benefits of the plans."
Towers Perrin research shows that employer-employee communication
regarding ABHPs is the most significant issue impacting the success
of ABHPs today. Conversely, the survey data show that ABHP plan
features have little bearing, positively or negatively, on how an
employee perceives the plan. This does not mean that plan structure
is irrelevant but, before a planfs structure can impact behavior, it
must be properly understood.
To truly realize the benefits of ABHPs, employers must:
- Be thoughtful and diligent in the design of the program.
- Gain and preserve employee trust by being realistic,
transparent and employee-centered in communication.
- Disseminate benefit plan information more frequently and
communicate beyond the open enrollment period.
- Address the emotional as well as the substantive issues of the
ABHP.
- Build employee confidence in their ability to manage their
health, their health care and their finances by providing the
necessary tools and resources.
- Work to increase employeesf health care time horizon beyond
year-to-year, to a multi-year and, ultimately, a lifelong
perspective.
The result will be an employee population that understands their
health benefit plan and is more confident, assertive and empowered
to make smarter health decisions.
"Employers have already accomplished many things with ABHPs, but
still have a long way to go. Employers now need to refocus
their efforts toward shifting the employee mindset about ABHPs to
achieve sustainable success. The stakes are just too high for
employers to do otherwise," said Guilmette.
About Towers Perrin Towers Perrin is a global
professional services firm that helps organizations improve their
performance through effective people, risk and financial management.
Through its HR Services business, Towers Perrin provides
global human resource consulting that helps organizations
effectively manage their investment in people. Areas of focus
include employee benefits, compensation, communication, change
management, employee research and the delivery of HR services.
The firmfs other businesses are Reinsurance, which provides
reinsurance intermediary services, and Tillinghast, which provides
management and actuarial consulting to the financial services
industry. Together these businesses have offices and business
partner locations in the United States, Canada, Europe, Asia, Latin
America, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand. More information
about Towers Perrin is available at www.towersperrin.com/hrservices. |